Clairton Coke Works in the distance
The town of Clairton sits in the shadow of U.S. Steel's massive Clairton Coke Works that hugs the banks of the Monongahela River. Photo: Reid Frazier / The Alleghen Front

What a court ruling on upholding a Biden-era air quality standard means for Pennsylvania

A federal appeals court ruling late last month upheld a key Biden administration air quality standard for fine particulate matter, or soot. The new rule, finalized in 2024, means that Pittsburgh and other parts of Pennsylvania could soon be out of compliance with Clean Air Act standards. 

LISTEN to an interview with Reid Frazier and The Allegheny Front’s Kara Holsopple

The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to review its ambient air quality standards every 5 years, but it also allows the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to update them more frequently.

The first Trump administration conducted its own review in 2020, but did not make changes. The next review would have been due in 2025, but in the last year of the Biden administration, the EPA reviewed new research and tightened the standard. 

The EPA said at the time that new studies showed lower levels of air pollution were needed to protect public health, and lowered the limit for soot pollution in the U.S. from 12 to 9 micrograms per cubic meter of air. 

Industry groups and states governed by Republicans sued to block the standard from going into effect. 

Eventually, the administrations changed, and the Trump EPA joined the lawsuit. But on June 26, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in the Biden EPA’s favor. 

The plaintiffs and the Trump EPA argued that the Biden administration hadn’t conducted a full evaluation of the standard and should have considered costs.  

But the appeals court ruled that the Biden administration followed the law of the Clean Air Act in arriving at its decision, and that cost should not be a factor in determining how much soot is safe in the air. So the rule stands. 

What is the PM 2.5 standard, and why is it important?

PM 2.5 are tiny particles (particulate matter smaller than 2.5 microns, which are one thousandth of a millimeter) that are mainly caused by combustion, particularly fossil fuels. Typical sources of particulate matter include industrial facilities, such as coal-fired power plants and steel mills, and vehicle exhaust. 

The reason these particles are so dangerous is their size: They’re small enough (1/30th the width of a human hair) to get deep into the lungs and are associated with heart attacks, decreased lung function, and asthma. They are also associated with neurological problems.  

“We know PM2.5 pollution has major health consequences, cardiovascular impacts, respiratory impacts… neurological conditions like Alzheimer’s disease and dementia,” said Sage Lincoln, an associate attorney at Earthjustice, one of the environmental groups that sued to keep the standards. 

EPA estimated when it came out with the new rules in 2024 that the lower standard would save 4,500 lives a year and essentially save $77 in health costs for every $1 companies and consumers have to pay to comply with the new rule

How does this affect places in Pennsylvania?

Several cities in Pennsylvania would be affected by a stricter PM 2.5 standard, including Pittsburgh. Allegheny County had been out of compliance with the former standard of 12 micrograms per cubic meter for years. Just a few years ago, it finally got into compliance by lowering PM 2.5 levels, and this April was determined to be in attainment with the standards. But its air is still not clean enough to meet the 9 micrograms per cubic meter standard. A state-run air monitor in Liberty, Allegheny County, near the U.S. Steel Clairton coke works, has the highest PM 2.5 levels in the state, averaging 11.6 micrograms per cubic meter. 

If the standards go into effect, states will have six years to meet the new standards. 

New EPA rule could rein in air pollution in Western Pennsylvania

Large factories with lots of emissions, like U.S. Steel’s operations in the Mon Valley near Pittsburgh, would likely have to come up with plans to lower their pollution. 

Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, says that could mean requiring stricter pollution controls at plants or taller smokestacks to increase dispersion of soot.

“It might require updating equipment that is old and outdated and leaks,” said Mehalik. “None of this stuff happens overnight. The whole thing is set up to ratchet down pollution over the course of five-year to 10-year periods of time.”

Pittsburgh isn’t the only place that would be affected by the revised standard. Philadelphia, Lancaster and the Harrisburg-York area would all be considered out of compliance if the new standard goes into effect. 

When will the new standard go into effect?

The EPA has thus far not enforced the 2024 standard pending this litigation. There is a lawsuit in the Northern District of California to force the EPA to do just that. In the meantime, the EPA could appeal the decision to the Supreme Court or propose a new, less stringent standard.

What is the Trump administration’s rationale for a less stringen soot standard?

The Trump administration has stressed the costs of regulations on industry. Trump has made several executive orders to that effect. The agency says the air in the U.S. has improved over the past 20 years, and that tightening the standard would make it harder to do things like permit large industrial projects, and implementing it would cost around $470 million a year.

“Under President Trump, we will ensure air quality standards for particulate matter are protective of human health and the environment while we unleash the Golden Age of American prosperity,” EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a statement

Reached for comment on the ruling, an EPA spokesperson said: “EPA is reviewing our options for appeal.”