Losing millions of dollars a year at its power plants, Ohio-based FirstEnergy has asked the Trump administration for help. Though it may have the president’s ear, it’s unclear how much President Trump can do to help the company’s struggling coal and nuclear plants.
FirstEnergy, which filed for bankruptcy last month, and plans to close three nuclear plants in Pennsylvania and Ohio, wants Energy Secretary Rick Perry to declare a “202(c)” grid emergency, and make customers in Pennsylvania and surrounding states pay more for electricity from nuclear and coal.
Otherwise, it says more plants will close.
Trump, at a recent tax roundtable in West Virginia, said of FirstEnergy’s request: “We’ll be looking at that. We’re tryin’.”
What is a 202? It’s a provision of federal law designed to keep the grid functioning during extreme events that could cause power outages, said Ari Peskoe, an electricity law professor at Harvard.
“It was specifically written by Congress in 1935 to ensure that electricity supply did not have the sort of problems that arose during World War I,” Peskoe said.
The Department of Energy has used the law only eight times since 2000. It’s been used to keep plants running after Hurricanes Katrina and Ike, and when a lightning strike knocked out a power plant last year.
What’s the emergency this time? Peskoe says that’s the problem.
“What FirstEnergy is describing in its application is not an emergency,” Pesko said. “It’s just that they’re not getting paid as much as they’d like. That’s not an emergency.”
What’s more, it’s requesting economic relief for its power plants over a period of four years.
“I think that they’re really, really stretching it,” said Sam Walsh, a former deputy general counsel for energy policy at the Department of Energy during the Obama administration.
“That is a very, very broad action that they’re asking D.O.E. to take,” he said.
FirstEnergy has argued that without a 202(c), PJM Interconnection, the power grid that covers the mid-Atlantic, could face blackouts during times of peak demand, as coal and nuclear plants continue to close.
“Nuclear and coal-fired generators in PJM have been closing at a rapid rate — putting PJM’s system resiliency at risk — and many more closures have been announced,” the FirstEnergy wrote, in its request letter to Perry. An agency spokeswoman said the request is “under review.”
The company said its coal and nuclear units have had a dismal time making money during a period when cheap natural gas is driving down the rates that power producers can charge customers.
FirstEnergy’s Bruce Mansfield plant, in Shippingport, Pa., lost $90 million in 2017 alone, and is projected to lose $104 million this year, according to the company’s bankruptcy documents.
PJM’s CEO Andy Ott says he is worried long-term about plant closures. But, Ott says, because of new natural gas plants, there’s no immediate danger of power outages.
“We have an oversupply situation. We have more power generation capability than we need. In fact, 10 percent more,” Ott said.
Many call the 202(c) emergency request a long shot. Environmental groups, oil and gas companies, and rival utilities all oppose it. The plan would likely face a legal battle if Perry were to approve it.
But the idea of subsidizing coal and nuclear plants keeps coming up.
Last year another company, Murray Energy, asked Perry to invoke the 202(c) provision. The company is FirstEnergy’s biggest coal supplier, and its owner, Bob Murray, is a big Trump backer.
Perry declined the request. But last year, he came up with his own subsidy plan, which federal regulators shot down.
Perry clearly wants to help coal and nuclear plants, but this week he hinted at an energy conference that the emergency measure was a long shot.
“The 202(c) may not be the way that we decide is the most appropriate, the most efficient to address this,” he said. “It is not the only way.”
But what other mechanism could Perry use to bail out coal and nuclear plants? He didn’t say.